{"site":{"name":"Koji","description":"AI-native customer research platform that helps teams conduct, analyze, and synthesize customer interviews at scale.","url":"https://www.koji.so","contentTypes":["blog","documentation"],"lastUpdated":"2026-06-04T08:37:49.400Z"},"content":[{"type":"documentation","id":"309da1c8-6c39-43b8-9fcd-f6aebc7e1fbb","slug":"ai-research-for-media-entertainment","title":"AI-Powered Audience Research for Media and Entertainment","url":"https://www.koji.so/docs/ai-research-for-media-entertainment","summary":"Media and entertainment companies can run subscriber, viewer, listener, and reader research at scale with AI interviews. Koji conducts voice or text conversations, probes answers with adaptive follow-ups, and analyzes hundreds of conversations into a report in days. Top use cases: cancellation and churn research, content and concept testing, subscriber satisfaction and NPS driver analysis, engagement and viewing-habit research, pricing/bundling/tier research, and ad-tier feedback. Six structured question types (open_ended, scale, single_choice, multiple_choice, ranking, yes_no) capture both quotes and chartable data, with automatic sentiment analysis. Credit model: text 1, voice 3; free tier 10 credits; paid from EUR 29/month.","content":"Media and entertainment companies can run subscriber, viewer, listener, and reader research at scale with AI interviews - capturing exactly why someone cancelled, what content they actually want, and where the experience loses them, without standing up a research panel. A platform like Koji conducts voice or text conversations with your audience, probes their answers with adaptive follow-up questions, and turns hundreds of conversations into an analyzed report in days. In a business where churn is the make-or-break metric, that is decision-grade audience intelligence on a content-team timeline.\n\n## Why audience understanding decides who wins streaming\n\nThe streaming and subscription media market has flipped from a growth game to a retention game. Average monthly churn now sits around 5.5%, up from roughly 2% in 2019, and about 23% of the U.S. streaming audience are now \"serial churners\" who cancel three or more services within two years. Cost is the number-one cancellation reason - cited by around 45% of users - while subscription prices have climbed roughly 25% in a single year. Every percentage point of churn you prevent is worth more than a point of new acquisition.\n\nThe problem is that dashboards tell you *who* churned and *when*, but never *why*. Was it price, a content gap, a clunky app, or simply finishing the one show they came for? A cancellation survey gives you a multiple-choice guess. AI interviews give you the actual reason in the subscriber's words - at the scale of a survey.\n\n## High-value research use cases for media brands\n\n- **Cancellation and churn research.** Trigger an interview at the cancel flow or just after, and let the AI probe the real driver. \"It was too expensive\" becomes \"I would have stayed at this price if there were more new releases each month.\"\n- **Content and concept testing.** Test show concepts, formats, trailers, podcast ideas, or newsletter directions with real audience members before you greenlight or commission.\n- **Subscriber satisfaction and NPS driver analysis.** Pair an NPS or satisfaction score with a conversational probe so you know what is actually behind the number. See the [NPS survey guide](/docs/nps-survey-guide).\n- **Engagement and viewing-habit research.** Understand how, when, and why people watch, listen, or read - and what makes them lapse into a passive, cancel-prone state.\n- **Pricing, bundling, and tier research.** With cost driving cancellations, understand willingness to pay, reactions to ad-supported tiers, and which bundles increase perceived value.\n- **Ad-tier and audience feedback.** As ad-supported tiers grow, interview those subscribers to balance monetization against experience.\n\n## Designing audience interviews that surface the real reason\n\nAudiences give lazy answers to lazy questions (\"the content\"). Koji's research brief is designed to prevent that. You define the *problem* (for example, \"subscribers who cancel within 60 days of signup\"), the *decision* it informs, and your *hypothesis*; the AI interviewer uses that context to adapt and follow the interesting thread instead of reading a fixed script.\n\nA strong churn interview might combine:\n\n- An **open-ended** opener: \"Tell me about the moment you decided to cancel.\" (The AI probes the trigger.)\n- A **single_choice** question on the primary cancellation reason, for clean segmentation.\n- A **scale** question on how likely they would be to resubscribe, with an anchor follow-up: \"You said 4 - what would bring you back?\"\n- A **ranking** question ordering what they value: catalog depth, new releases, price, app quality, exclusives.\n- A **yes/no** question on whether they finished what they came to watch.\n\nThat mix of qualitative depth and structured, chartable data is Koji's core differentiator. The six structured question types - open_ended, scale, single_choice, multiple_choice, ranking, and yes_no - let one interview produce both a usable quote for a content pitch and a clean chart for a leadership review. The [structured questions guide](/docs/structured-questions-guide) shows how each type maps to a report visualization, and automatic [sentiment analysis](/docs/sentiment-analysis-interviews) surfaces emotional patterns across hundreds of conversations.\n\n## Voice or text - meeting audiences where they are\n\nMedia audiences are mobile and impatient. Text interviews fit a phone in a spare minute and capture candid, written feedback; voice interviews capture the enthusiasm or frustration that reveals what an audience truly feels about a show or an app. Koji supports both, so you can run quick text churn interviews and richer voice sessions for content discovery. The trade-offs are in [voice vs text interviews](/docs/voice-vs-text-interviews).\n\n## Run research at audience scale, in real time\n\nThe reason media teams under-research is speed: by the time a traditional study finishes, the content slate has moved on. Koji removes the lag. Share one interview link - in the cancel flow, an email, an in-app prompt, or a newsletter - and the AI conducts every conversation in parallel, 24/7, in the audience member's language. No scheduling, no moderator, no panel agency.\n\nFor qualitative discovery, 8-15 interviews per segment (recent cancellers, bingers, lapsed readers) usually reaches theme saturation in days. Scale to hundreds when you need statistically meaningful structured-question results - for example, to size cancellation reasons across your base. After each interview, Koji analyzes the transcript, scores its quality, codes open-ended answers into themes, and updates a real-time report, so the churn story is current enough to act on this quarter, not last one. This continuous approach contrasts sharply with one-shot surveys, as explained in [AI interviews vs surveys](/docs/ai-interviews-vs-surveys).\n\n## What it costs\n\nKoji uses a simple credit model: a text interview costs 1 credit, a voice interview costs 3, and a report refresh costs 5. The free tier includes 10 credits to pilot a churn study. Paid plans start at EUR 29/month (Insights, 29 credits) and EUR 79/month (Interviews, 79 credits), with Enterprise options for large subscriber bases. A quality gate ensures only conversations scoring 3 or higher consume credits. Against the lifetime value of a retained subscriber, the cost of understanding why they almost left is trivial.\n\n## From churn metric to retention strategy\n\nThe media brands that hold their audiences are the ones that understand them in their own words - continuously, not once a year. AI interviews make that feasible: a churn interview on every cancellation, a concept test before every greenlight, and a satisfaction pulse running always-on, all from one platform and all analyzed automatically. You move from watching the churn number to actually changing it.\n\n## Common mistakes media teams make in audience research\n\nEven data-rich media organizations leave insight on the table. The recurring errors:\n\n- **Asking only at renewal or cancel time.** By the cancel flow, the disengagement happened weeks earlier. Run always-on satisfaction interviews so you catch the drift before the decision.\n- **Confusing usage data with understanding.** Analytics show a subscriber stopped watching; only a conversation tells you whether it was price, a content gap, or life simply getting busy. Pair your dashboards with Koji interviews to get the why.\n- **Over-indexing on power fans.** The loudest community members are not your churn risk. Deliberately interview lapsed and passive segments, where the retention upside actually lives.\n- **Testing content with internal opinion instead of audience voice.** Greenlighting on gut feel is expensive. A quick concept test with real audience members - including a ranking of what they value - de-risks the slate.\n\nAvoiding these turns research from a quarterly autopsy into a steering signal.\n\n## Related Resources\n\n- [Structured Questions Guide](/docs/structured-questions-guide) - the six question types that turn interviews into chartable data\n- [Customer Retention Research](/docs/customer-retention-research) - reduce churn with proactive interviews\n- [NPS Survey Guide](/docs/nps-survey-guide) - measure satisfaction and find its drivers\n- [Sentiment Analysis in Interviews](/docs/sentiment-analysis-interviews) - read emotion across hundreds of conversations\n- [Voice of Customer Research Program](/docs/voice-of-customer-research-program) - build an always-on listening program\n- [AI Interviews vs Surveys](/docs/ai-interviews-vs-surveys) - why conversations beat static forms for audience research","category":"Use Cases","lastModified":"2026-06-04T03:17:25.55283+00:00","metaTitle":"AI Research for Media & Entertainment: Subscriber & Audience Interviews","metaDescription":"How streaming services, publishers, and media brands run AI-powered interviews with subscribers and audiences to cut churn, test content, and grow engagement at scale.","keywords":["ai research for media","media audience research","streaming churn research","subscriber research","entertainment market research","content testing","viewer feedback"],"aiSummary":"Media and entertainment companies can run subscriber, viewer, listener, and reader research at scale with AI interviews. Koji conducts voice or text conversations, probes answers with adaptive follow-ups, and analyzes hundreds of conversations into a report in days. Top use cases: cancellation and churn research, content and concept testing, subscriber satisfaction and NPS driver analysis, engagement and viewing-habit research, pricing/bundling/tier research, and ad-tier feedback. Six structured question types (open_ended, scale, single_choice, multiple_choice, ranking, yes_no) capture both quotes and chartable data, with automatic sentiment analysis. Credit model: text 1, voice 3; free tier 10 credits; paid from EUR 29/month.","aiPrerequisites":["A view of your subscriber lifecycle (acquire, engage, lapse, cancel)","A Koji account (free tier includes 10 credits)","A way to reach audiences (email list, in-app prompt, cancel flow, or newsletter)"],"aiLearningOutcomes":["Identify the highest-value audience research use cases in media","Design churn and content-testing interviews that surface the real reason","Pair NPS and satisfaction scores with conversational probing","Run audience research in real time at subscriber scale","Use voice and text interviews to match how audiences engage"],"aiDifficulty":"intermediate","aiEstimatedTime":"9 minutes"}],"pagination":{"total":1,"returned":1,"offset":0}}