{"site":{"name":"Koji","description":"AI-native customer research platform that helps teams conduct, analyze, and synthesize customer interviews at scale.","url":"https://www.koji.so","contentTypes":["blog","documentation"],"lastUpdated":"2026-05-18T12:36:57.082Z"},"content":[{"type":"documentation","id":"785d8f2e-bc31-410f-8d9b-cf491387a95f","slug":"koji-vs-usertesting","title":"Koji vs. UserTesting — Enterprise Research Quality at a Fraction of the Cost","url":"https://www.koji.so/docs/koji-vs-usertesting","summary":"Comparison of Koji (AI-powered interviews) vs UserTesting (enterprise usability testing platform). UserTesting offers screen recording, human moderation, and panel access starting at $15K/year. Koji provides AI-powered interviews with automatic analysis, voice support, and methodology guardrails at a fraction of the cost. Best for teams needing continuous qualitative research without enterprise budgets.","content":"## The Short Answer\n\nUserTesting built the gold standard for remote usability testing and moderated research — used by 75 of the Fortune 100. But at **$15,000-$50,000+ per year** with per-session costs of **$200-300**, it prices out most startups, scale-ups, and lean teams. Koji delivers comparable depth through AI-powered interviews at a fraction of the cost, with studies that launch in minutes instead of days and results that are analyzed automatically.\n\n---\n\n## Who Each Tool Serves\n\n### UserTesting Is Built For:\n- **Enterprise UX teams** with dedicated research budgets ($50K+/year)\n- **Usability testing** — watching users interact with prototypes and live products\n- **Panel access** — recruiting from UserTesting's proprietary participant panel\n- **Video-based studies** — screen recordings with think-aloud narration\n- **Large organizations** that need SOC 2, SSO, and enterprise compliance\n\n### Koji Is Built For:\n- **Product teams of any size** — from solo founders to enterprise research orgs\n- **Qualitative interviews** — understanding the *why* behind user behavior through conversation\n- **Continuous discovery** — running research every week, not quarterly\n- **Teams without dedicated researchers** — the AI handles moderation and analysis\n- **Anyone who needs depth without the enterprise price tag**\n\n---\n\n## Feature Comparison\n\n| Capability | UserTesting | Koji |\n|-----------|------------|------|\n| **Primary method** | Usability testing + moderated interviews | AI-powered qualitative interviews |\n| **Moderation** | Human moderators or unmoderated tasks | AI moderator with [methodology guardrails](/docs/choosing-a-methodology) |\n| **Voice support** | ✅ Video calls with screen share | ✅ [AI voice interviews](/docs/voice-interview-experience) |\n| **Participant panel** | ✅ Large proprietary panel | Bring your own + [import via CSV](/docs/importing-participants-csv) |\n| **Setup time** | Hours to days (scheduling required) | [5-10 minutes](/docs/creating-your-first-study) |\n| **Time to first result** | 1-3 days | Minutes (first interview can start immediately) |\n| **Follow-up probing** | ✅ Manual (moderator decides) | ✅ Automatic (AI probes on interesting answers) |\n| **Analysis** | Manual (watch videos, take notes) | [Automated themes, insights, reports](/docs/ai-generated-insights) |\n| **Research reports** | Manual creation | [Auto-generated, shareable](/docs/publishing-sharing-reports) |\n| **Screen recording** | ✅ Core feature | ❌ Interview-focused, not task-based |\n| **Prototype testing** | ✅ Click-through testing | ❌ (focused on conversational research) |\n| **API** | ✅ Enterprise API | ✅ [Full REST API + embed](/docs/api-authentication) |\n| **AI assistant integration** | ❌ | ✅ [Claude MCP](/docs/mcp-overview) |\n| **Pricing** | $15,000-$50,000+/year | Free tier + affordable plans |\n\n---\n\n## Where UserTesting Falls Short\n\n### 1. Cost Prohibits Continuous Research\n\nAt $200-300 per session, a 10-participant study costs **$2,000-3,000**. Running that monthly costs $24,000-36,000/year — before the platform subscription. Most teams can only afford 2-4 studies per quarter, creating long gaps between customer contact.\n\nTeresa Torres' Continuous Discovery framework recommends talking to customers **every week**. At UserTesting prices, that is mathematically impossible for most teams. Koji makes weekly research economically viable — studies launch in minutes and interviews are included in plan pricing.\n\n### 2. Scheduling Creates Delays\n\nA typical UserTesting study timeline:\n- Day 1: Design study, write tasks and questions\n- Day 2-3: Recruit and schedule participants\n- Day 3-5: Conduct sessions\n- Day 5-7: Watch recordings, take notes, synthesize\n- Day 7-10: Create and share report\n\nTotal: **7-10 business days** from question to answer.\n\nA typical Koji study timeline:\n- Minutes 1-10: Describe research goal, [AI generates the plan](/docs/understanding-the-ai-consultant)\n- Minutes 10-15: [Share interview link](/docs/sharing-your-interview-link)\n- Hours 1-48: Interviews happen asynchronously\n- Immediate: [AI analyzes and themes results](/docs/understanding-themes-patterns)\n\nTotal: **24-48 hours** from question to analyzed insights.\n\n### 3. Manual Analysis Is the Real Bottleneck\n\nAfter a UserTesting study, someone has to watch 10+ video recordings (each 15-45 minutes), take timestamped notes, identify patterns, code themes, and create a report. Industry research shows this synthesis takes **2-3 hours per interview hour** — meaning a 10-session study requires 30+ hours of analysis.\n\nKoji eliminates this entirely. Every interview is automatically transcribed, [quality-scored](/docs/how-the-quality-gate-works), and analyzed. Themes are identified across all conversations. [Research reports](/docs/generating-research-reports) are generated with one click.\n\n### 4. Human Moderator Inconsistency\n\nEven skilled moderators have off days. They miss follow-up opportunities, inadvertently lead participants, or let their energy flag during the fifth session of the day. Each participant gets a slightly different experience.\n\nKoji's AI interviewer is consistent across every session — applying the same [methodology](/docs/choosing-a-methodology), following up with equal depth, and never getting tired. It follows [bias prevention guardrails](/docs/avoiding-bias-in-interviews) on every question.\n\n---\n\n## When UserTesting Is the Better Choice\n\nUserTesting wins when:\n\n- You need **usability testing with screen recording** — watching users click through prototypes or live products\n- You need **panel access** — recruiting from a large, pre-screened participant database\n- Your research requires **task-based observation** — seeing *how* users complete specific workflows\n- You need **enterprise compliance** — SOC 2 Type II, SSO, advanced permissions, SLA guarantees\n- You are doing **accessibility testing** — observing assistive technology usage in real-time\n- You have a **dedicated research team** with the budget and time for manual synthesis\n\n---\n\n## When to Choose Koji Instead\n\nChoose Koji when:\n\n- You need **interview-based research** — understanding motivations, pain points, and decision-making processes\n- You want to run research **continuously** — weekly or daily, not quarterly\n- You do not have a **dedicated research team** — Koji handles moderation and analysis\n- Your budget does not support **$15,000+/year** platforms\n- You need results **in hours, not weeks**\n- You want to [democratize research](/docs/mcp-workflow-product-managers) — let PMs, designers, and founders run their own studies\n- You need to conduct **50+ interviews** per study for broader qualitative coverage\n- You want research integrated into your AI workflow via [Claude MCP](/docs/mcp-setup-claude)\n\n---\n\n## The Emerging Model: Use Both\n\nThe most sophisticated research teams are adopting a hybrid approach:\n\n1. **Koji for discovery** — weekly AI interviews to surface what matters (fast, affordable, continuous)\n2. **UserTesting for validation** — targeted usability tests when you need to observe specific interactions (deep, visual, task-based)\n\nThis model replaces the old \"run a big quarterly study\" approach with continuous learning, reserving expensive moderated sessions for the highest-impact questions.\n\n---\n\n## Pricing Comparison\n\n| | UserTesting Essentials | UserTesting Advanced | UserTesting Ultimate | Koji |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Annual cost | ~$15,000/yr | ~$30,000/yr | $50,000+/yr | Free tier + plans |\n| Per-session cost | $200-300 | Included (limited) | Included | Included in plan |\n| Sessions/interviews | ~50-75/year | More | Unlimited | Based on credits |\n| Analysis | Manual (you watch videos) | Manual + some AI features | Manual + QXscore | Fully automated |\n| Setup to first result | 3-7 days | 3-7 days | 3-7 days | Hours |\n| AI integration | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ [Claude MCP](/docs/mcp-overview) |\n\n**For the price of one UserTesting study (10 sessions at $250 each = $2,500), you can run an entire quarter of continuous research on Koji.**\n\n---\n\n## Getting Started\n\n1. **[Create your account](/docs/creating-your-account)** — free tier to test with\n2. **[Set up your first study](/docs/creating-your-first-study)** — describe what you want to learn\n3. **[Choose a methodology](/docs/choosing-a-methodology)** — Mom Test, JTBD, or general discovery\n4. **[Share the interview link](/docs/sharing-your-interview-link)** — with your existing user base or imported participants\n5. **[Review analyzed insights](/docs/insights-dashboard)** — themes, sentiment, and quality scores generated automatically\n\n---\n\n## Next Steps\n\n- **[Quick Start Guide](/docs/quick-start-guide)** — First AI interview in 10 minutes\n- **[AI Interviews vs. Surveys](/docs/ai-interviews-vs-surveys)** — Why conversations beat forms\n- **[Koji vs. Typeform](/docs/koji-vs-typeform)** — Comparison with popular form builder\n- **[Koji vs. SurveyMonkey](/docs/koji-vs-surveymonkey)** — Comparison with leading survey tool\n- **[The Definitive Guide to User Interviews](/docs/user-interview-guide)** — Master qualitative methodology\n- **[MCP Workflow for Product Managers](/docs/mcp-workflow-product-managers)** — Automate research with Claude\n\n## Further reading on the blog\n\n- [Koji vs UserTesting: Which User Research Platform Is Right for You?](/blog/koji-vs-usertesting) — UserTesting built the enterprise standard for video-based user testing. Koji built the AI-native alternative. Here is an honest comparison t\n- [Koji vs UserTesting: AI-Powered vs Panel-Based Research (2026)](/blog/koji-vs-usertesting-2026) — UserTesting averages $36,265/year for SMB teams. Koji starts at €99/month. Here's an honest comparison of AI-native interviews vs panel-base\n- [Best Qualitative Research Tools in 2026: The Complete Buyer's Guide](/blog/best-qualitative-research-tools-2026) — Comparing the top qualitative research platforms in 2026 — from AI-native interview tools to research repositories. Find the right tool for \n\n<!-- further-reading:blog -->\n","category":"Comparisons","lastModified":"2026-05-13T00:25:38.788654+00:00","metaTitle":"Koji vs. UserTesting — AI Interviews vs. Enterprise Usability Platform | Koji","metaDescription":"Compare Koji and UserTesting for user research. See how AI-powered interviews deliver enterprise-quality insights at a fraction of UserTesting's cost — with faster setup, automated analysis, and continuous discovery capability.","keywords":["Koji vs UserTesting","UserTesting alternative","UserTesting alternative cheaper","AI interview vs usability testing","best UserTesting alternative","UserTesting vs Koji","affordable user research platform","replace UserTesting","user research tool comparison","cheaper than UserTesting"],"aiSummary":"Comparison of Koji (AI-powered interviews) vs UserTesting (enterprise usability testing platform). UserTesting offers screen recording, human moderation, and panel access starting at $15K/year. Koji provides AI-powered interviews with automatic analysis, voice support, and methodology guardrails at a fraction of the cost. Best for teams needing continuous qualitative research without enterprise budgets.","aiPrerequisites":["Familiarity with user research tools","Understanding of usability testing vs interviews"],"aiLearningOutcomes":["Understand key differences between AI interviews and usability testing","Compare pricing models and ROI","Know when to use UserTesting vs Koji","Evaluate hybrid research approaches"],"aiDifficulty":"beginner","aiEstimatedTime":"13 minutes"},{"type":"blog","id":"cdc57651-b88d-4025-ba9f-c0264ae0de19","slug":"koji-vs-usertesting","title":"Koji vs UserTesting: Which User Research Platform Is Right for You?","url":"https://www.koji.so/blog/koji-vs-usertesting","summary":"Koji and UserTesting answer different research questions: UserTesting is optimized for observational task-based research with video recording and a large participant panel, while Koji conducts AI-moderated conversational interviews automatically at a fraction of the cost. Koji is best for teams that need to understand user motivations and run research continuously; UserTesting is best for enterprise teams needing video-based usability testing at scale.","content":"\nChoosing between Koji and UserTesting? Both platforms help teams understand how users experience their products — but they take fundamentally different approaches, target different team sizes, and deliver different types of insight.\n\n**The short answer:** UserTesting is an enterprise-grade video testing platform with a massive participant panel. It is best for large organizations that need to observe users completing tasks on a live product, at scale, with video recordings. Koji is an AI-native interview platform that conducts conversational research automatically — best for teams who need to understand *why* users behave the way they do, faster and at a fraction of the cost.\n\n## Quick Comparison\n\n| Feature | Koji | UserTesting |\n|---------|------|-------------|\n| AI-moderated interviews | ✅ Voice and text | ❌ Not available |\n| Unmoderated video testing | ❌ | ✅ Core feature |\n| Moderated live sessions | ❌ | ✅ Available |\n| Participant panel | ❌ Bring your own | ✅ 1.5M+ vetted testers |\n| Automatic thematic analysis | ✅ Themes, sentiment, insights | ⚠️ AI highlights from video |\n| One-click research reports | ✅ Full aggregate report | ⚠️ Manual synthesis required |\n| Study design AI assistant | ✅ AI consultant | ❌ |\n| Prototype/live website testing | ❌ | ✅ Screen + click recording |\n| No scheduling required | ✅ Fully async | ✅ Unmoderated sessions |\n| Free plan | ✅ 1 study, 5 interviews | ❌ No free tier |\n| Starting price | €99/month | $15,000+/year |\n| Best team size | Startups to enterprise | Enterprise |\n\n## What Is UserTesting?\n\nUserTesting is a video-based user research platform used primarily by enterprise teams. Its core product lets you recruit participants from a panel of 1.5M+ vetted testers and ask them to complete tasks on your website, prototype, or app while narrating their thoughts aloud. You receive video recordings, transcripts, and behavioral data from each session.\n\nUserTesting also supports moderated sessions, where a researcher joins live to guide the participant. More recently, the platform has added AI-powered features to help teams surface highlights and patterns across video recordings faster.\n\nUserTesting is owned by UserZoom (acquired in 2022), making it one of the largest consolidated enterprise research platforms.\n\n### Where UserTesting Shines\n\n**Participant panel breadth.** UserTesting panel of 1.5M+ vetted participants spans demographics, geographies, and professional segments. If you need 15 small business owners between the ages of 45–55 in the United Kingdom by tomorrow morning, UserTesting can typically deliver that. No other platform in this guide has comparable panel reach.\n\n**Observational, task-based research.** When you need to watch real users navigate your product — where they click, where they hesitate, where they get confused — UserTesting video sessions are the gold standard. The combination of screen recording, facial expressions, and verbal commentary gives researchers a rich dataset to work with.\n\n**Enterprise infrastructure.** UserTesting offers the security, compliance, SSO, and procurement processes that large organizations require. For research teams embedded in Fortune 500 companies, this matters.\n\n**Mature tooling.** UserTesting has been building its platform for more than 15 years. The session recording tools, highlight reel creation, and sharing features are polished and reliable.\n\n### Where UserTesting Falls Short\n\n**Cost.** This is the most significant barrier. UserTesting pricing starts at approximately $15,000/year, with most enterprise contracts in the $30,000–$200,000+/year range depending on volume and features. For most startups and growing companies, this is inaccessible.\n\n**No AI interviewer.** UserTesting does not conduct conversational interviews. Participants follow a script and complete tasks; the platform does not probe, follow up on interesting answers, or adapt the conversation based on what participants say. You are essentially watching people complete a pre-defined script rather than having a dialogue.\n\n**Research at scale requires significant budget.** Each participant recruited from the UserTesting panel carries a per-session cost. Running 100 conversational interviews to understand a complex behavioral question would cost tens of thousands of dollars through UserTesting — and would require a human moderator for each session.\n\n**Synthesis is manual.** Despite AI highlight features, turning a library of video sessions into a synthesized, shareable research report still requires significant manual effort. According to the Lyssna Research Synthesis Report 2025, 60.3% of researchers cite manual synthesis work as their biggest frustration — UserTesting does not fully solve this.\n\n## What Is Koji?\n\nKoji is an AI-native qualitative research platform. You design a research study with an AI consultant, set your objectives, and an AI interviewer conducts natural voice or text conversations with your participants automatically. There is no scheduling, no human moderator, and no post-session transcription work.\n\nAfter interviews complete, Koji identifies themes, analyzes sentiment, and generates a research report aggregating insights across all conversations. The full cycle — from research question to shareable findings — can happen in hours.\n\n### Where Koji Shines\n\n**Conversational depth at scale.** Koji AI interviewer asks contextual follow-up questions, probes interesting answers, and explores threads the discussion guide never anticipated. Where UserTesting gets participants to complete a task, Koji gets participants to explain their mental model, motivations, and frustrations in their own words — without a moderator blocking your calendar.\n\n**Cost efficiency.** Koji paid plans start at €99/month with a free tier including 5 interviews. Running 50 in-depth conversational interviews through Koji costs a fraction of what a single UserTesting enterprise contract costs. This makes regular, continuous research economically viable for any team size.\n\n**Automatic synthesis.** Koji analysis is not an add-on — it is built into the platform. Every interview is automatically analyzed for themes and sentiment. When you generate a report, Koji aggregates findings across all interviews and surfaces patterns automatically. No manual video review, no tagging, no synthesis sprint.\n\n**Speed to insight.** According to the Maze Future of User Research Report 2026, 22% of organizations now use research at every level of business strategy — up from 8% just a year prior. That pace requires insights on the timeline of business decisions, not 2-week research cycles. Koji makes same-week research the norm.\n\n**Accessible to non-researchers.** The AI consultant guides any team member through study design and question writing. A product manager or founder with no research training can run a rigorous study without needing a dedicated researcher or research operations budget.\n\n### Where Koji Falls Short\n\n**Task-based observational research.** If you need to watch users navigate your product — where they click, where they drop off, how they interact with a specific interface — Koji is not the right tool. This is UserTesting core strength. Koji is built for conversational research (why do users behave this way), not observational research (how do users interact with this interface).\n\n**No participant panel.** Koji does not recruit participants for you. You bring your own users via email, in-app messaging, or any distribution channel you use to reach customers. For teams with established customer relationships, this is not a barrier. For teams that need anonymous third-party participants, you would pair Koji with a recruitment service like User Interviews.\n\n## The Core Difference: Why vs How\n\nThe most useful way to understand the Koji vs UserTesting choice is by the research questions each tool answers:\n\n**UserTesting answers \"How do users interact with my product?\"**\n- Where do users click on this page?\n- Can users complete the checkout flow?\n- Where do users get confused in this onboarding sequence?\n\n**Koji answers \"Why do users make the decisions they make?\"**\n- Why did users churn after 30 days?\n- What are the biggest frustrations users have with this workflow?\n- What would make users recommend this product to a colleague?\n- What alternatives did users consider before choosing us?\n\nBoth questions matter. The best-resourced research teams use tools that answer both.\n\n## When to Choose Koji vs UserTesting\n\n**Choose Koji if:**\n- You need to understand user motivations, decision-making, and frustrations at scale\n- Your team does not have a $15,000+ annual research tools budget\n- You want to run research continuously rather than in occasional large studies\n- You need findings fast (days, not weeks)\n- You do not have a dedicated research team but need rigorous qualitative insights\n- You want to hear directly from your own customers in their own words\n\n**Choose UserTesting if:**\n- You are an enterprise organization with a significant research budget\n- You need to observe task completion on a live product or prototype\n- You need access to a large, vetted third-party participant panel\n- You have dedicated research staff who need enterprise tooling and compliance features\n- Your primary research questions are about usability and UI behavior, not customer motivation\n\n**Consider using both if:** Your team needs both observational (usability) research and conversational (motivational) research. Koji handles the \"why\" at scale; UserTesting handles the \"how\" with video proof.\n\n## Pricing Comparison\n\n| | Koji | UserTesting |\n|---|---|---|\n| Free tier | ✅ 1 study, 5 interviews | ❌ None |\n| Entry price | €99/month | ~$15,000/year |\n| Mid-market | €299–€599/month | ~$30,000–$75,000/year |\n| Enterprise | Custom | ~$100,000–$200,000+/year |\n\nThe cost difference is significant. A startup or small product team can run meaningful, recurring customer research with Koji for less than $1,200/year. The equivalent budget at UserTesting would not cover a single contract.\n\n## Our Take\n\nUserTesting built the enterprise standard for video-based usability research over 15+ years. For large organizations that need to observe users completing tasks at scale, with enterprise compliance and a vast participant panel, it remains a strong choice.\n\nBut for most product teams — especially those trying to understand customers more deeply, run research more frequently, or make qualitative research accessible across the organization without dedicated researchers — Koji delivers more research value per dollar by an order of magnitude. The AI-native approach removes the cost, scheduling, and synthesis overhead that has historically made deep qualitative research a luxury for well-resourced teams.\n\n*Last verified: March 2026*\n\n## Frequently Asked Questions\n\n**Is UserTesting worth the price?**\nFor enterprise teams with dedicated research budgets and a need for large-scale video-based usability testing, UserTesting is well-established. For most startups and growing companies, the cost is prohibitive relative to alternatives like Koji that deliver comparable or greater insight depth for a fraction of the price.\n\n**Does Koji have a participant panel like UserTesting?**\nNo. Koji does not recruit participants. You distribute your study link to your own users via email, in-app messaging, or any channel you use to reach customers. For teams that need third-party participants, pairing Koji with a recruitment service like User Interviews is a cost-effective alternative to UserTesting.\n\n**Which tool is better for usability testing?**\nFor task-based usability testing where you need to observe users navigating an interface with video recording, UserTesting is purpose-built for that use case. Koji is better suited to conversational research — understanding motivations, frustrations, and decision-making at scale.\n\n**Can Koji conduct the same type of research as UserTesting?**\nThey address different research questions. UserTesting is optimized for observational research (how users interact with your product). Koji is optimized for conversational research (why users think and feel the way they do about your product and category). Most product teams need both types of research.\n\n**Is there a free alternative to UserTesting?**\nKoji offers a free tier with 1 study and 5 AI-moderated interviews. For recruitment, User Interviews offers project-based pricing without an annual commitment. Lookback also offers a 60-day free trial for moderated sessions.\n  ","category":"Research","lastModified":"2026-05-13T00:21:33.326941+00:00","metaTitle":"Koji vs UserTesting: Which Platform Wins? — Koji Blog","metaDescription":"UserTesting is the enterprise standard for video-based usability research. Koji is the AI-native alternative for conversational interviews. Compare pricing, features, and use cases.","keywords":["koji vs usertesting","usertesting alternative","usertesting competitor","ai user research tool","user research platform comparison","usertesting pricing","qualitative research tools"],"aiSummary":"Koji and UserTesting answer different research questions: UserTesting is optimized for observational task-based research with video recording and a large participant panel, while Koji conducts AI-moderated conversational interviews automatically at a fraction of the cost. Koji is best for teams that need to understand user motivations and run research continuously; UserTesting is best for enterprise teams needing video-based usability testing at scale.","aiKeywords":["Koji vs UserTesting","UserTesting alternative","AI interview platform","user research platform","usability testing","qualitative research","AI-moderated interviews","user testing pricing"],"aiContentType":"comparison","faqItems":[{"answer":"For enterprise teams with dedicated research budgets needing large-scale video-based usability testing, UserTesting is well-established. For most startups and growing companies, the cost is prohibitive. Koji delivers comparable insight depth for a fraction of the price.","question":"Is UserTesting worth the price?"},{"answer":"No. Koji does not recruit participants. You distribute your study link to your own users. For third-party participants, pairing Koji with a recruitment service like User Interviews is a cost-effective alternative to UserTesting.","question":"Does Koji have a participant panel like UserTesting?"},{"answer":"For task-based usability testing with video recording, UserTesting is purpose-built for that use case. Koji is better for conversational research: understanding motivations, frustrations, and decision-making at scale.","question":"Which tool is better for usability testing?"},{"answer":"They address different research questions. UserTesting is optimized for observational research (how users interact with your product). Koji is optimized for conversational research (why users behave the way they do).","question":"Can Koji conduct the same type of research as UserTesting?"},{"answer":"Koji offers a free tier with 1 study and 5 AI-moderated interviews. User Interviews offers project-based recruitment pricing. Lookback offers a 60-day free trial for moderated sessions.","question":"Is there a free alternative to UserTesting?"}],"relatedTopics":["User Research Tools","Tool Comparisons","Qualitative Research","Usability Testing","AI Research","Product Research"]}],"pagination":{"total":2,"returned":2,"offset":0}}