All frameworks and cheat sheets

Flowchart

Which course evaluation reporting setup fits?

For quality and teaching and learning teams comparing course evaluation reporting tools

Flowchart for choosing a course evaluation reporting setup: three questions, two side steps, ending in a re-run with the next cohort.
Most universities end up with a score platform plus a way to get deeper comments. This shows where each piece fits.
Download PNG

A decision flowchart for quality and teaching and learning teams choosing how to report course evaluation results. It asks whether reports must roll up through the course hierarchy, whether paper or on-premise hosting is required, and whether open comments are detailed enough to act on. It then points to a score platform, EvaSys, the text analysis you already have, or AI-moderated interviews. Koji covers the interview step, with themed reports that download as editable slides or a PDF.

What's in this flowchart

Start: Choosing a reporting layer

  1. Must reports roll up by course, department and faculty?
    • No: go to 2.
    • Yes: Keep a SET platform for scores. Blue, Watermark, Anthology or EvaSys route reports by teaching role. Then go to 2.
  2. Do you still run paper or need on-premise hosting?
    • No: go to 3.
    • Yes: Look at EvaSys first. It supports paper and scan hybrids and on-premise options. Then go to 3.
  3. Are the comments too thin to act on?
    • Yes: go to 4.
    • No: Use the text analysis you have. Text iQ, MLY or EvaSys topics may be enough.
  4. Add AI-moderated interviews. Koji asks follow-up questions and groups answers into themes with quotes.
  5. Share findings as slides or a PDF. Edit the deck, then log each action in your quality process.
  6. Finish: Re-run with the next cohort. Compare the new report with last year's by hand.

Use this image

Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:

html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-reporting-tool-decision-flowchart"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-reporting-tool-decision-flowchart/course-evaluation-reporting-tool-decision-flowchart.png" alt="Flowchart for choosing a course evaluation reporting setup: three questions, two side steps, ending in a re-run with the next cohort." width="1200" height="1646" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-reporting-tool-decision-flowchart">Which course evaluation reporting setup fits?</a>, Koji</p>

Related

Flowchart for checking if an AI answer about your idea is real evidence: real behaviour, repeat across people, then commitment.

Is your AI idea check real evidence?

Flowchart for testing a price assumption in due diligence: list price or not, blind price test, demand check, revenue-weighted renewal answers, keep or cut

Testing the price line in due diligence

Flowchart for choosing grounded theory coding or Saldaña's cycles: four questions, a loop back to open coding, ending in selective coding.

Grounded theory coding or Saldaña's cycles?