Checklist
Practical checks for a course evaluation system
Questions a quality office can ask about how evaluations are requested, returned and used
An eight-point checklist for reviewing the practical side of a university course evaluation system: how easy it is to request an evaluation, how fast results come back and whether teachers can ask their own questions. It draws on Moskal, Stein and Golding, who found that an easier online ordering process raised staff engagement at one New Zealand university. Koji lets teachers set up their own AI-moderated course evaluation studies and read results as interviews finish.
What's in this checklist
- Requesting an evaluation takes minutes, not a form and an email chain
- Teachers can request extra evaluations for their own questions
- Each course type can add questions to a short common core
- Results reach teachers before they plan the next run of the course
- You know the time from survey close to report
- You track voluntary evaluations requested over time
- Results have a place to be discussed, such as a programme meeting
- Staff are asked each year whether the system helps them
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-system-practical-implementation-checklist"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-system-practical-implementation-checklist/course-evaluation-system-practical-implementation-checklist.png" alt="Checklist of practical checks for a course evaluation system, from how long it takes to request an evaluation to whether teachers can add their own questions." width="1080" height="1080" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-system-practical-implementation-checklist">Practical checks for a course evaluation system</a>, Koji</p>
