Reference table
Mentimeter vs Koji for course evaluation
A side-by-side table for quality and teaching leads choosing between a live-polling tool and an interview-based course evaluation tool. It sets out how students answer, whether anyone asks a follow-up, how open answers are analysed and where the data sits. Use it to brief a committee or a procurement panel. Koji runs the interview side, with themes, quotes and recommended actions in each report.
What's in this reference table
| Mentimeter | Koji | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Live polling and interactive presentations | Course feedback through AI-moderated interviews |
| How students answer | In the lecture or self-paced, by join code | Text or voice interview, by shared or personal link |
| Follow-up questions | No | Yes, vague answers get a follow-up |
| Open-answer analysis | AI grouping per question | Themes across the whole study, with quotes |
| Recommended actions | No | In every report, follow-up stays in your QA process |
| Comparing terms | Manual, outside the tool | Same brief each term, comparison done by you |
| Anonymity | Anonymous audience responses | Anonymous shared link, or personal links |
| Data location | Mostly EU | EU data residency |
| Best fit | Engagement during teaching | Evidence for module review and QA |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/mentimeter-vs-koji-course-evaluation-table"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/mentimeter-vs-koji-course-evaluation-table/mentimeter-vs-koji-course-evaluation-table.png" alt="Comparison table of Mentimeter and Koji for course evaluation: follow-up questions, open-answer analysis, actions, anonymity and data location." width="1200" height="986" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/mentimeter-vs-koji-course-evaluation-table">Mentimeter vs Koji for course evaluation</a>, Koji</p>
