Reference table
Nunnally's reliability thresholds, by how the score is used

What Jum Nunnally actually recommended for reliability in Psychometric Theory (1978): 0.70 is enough while you develop an instrument, 0.80 for basic research comparing group means, and 0.90 as the minimum, with 0.95 desirable, when important decisions rest on individual scores. Use it to pick the right bar for a Cronbach's alpha or omega before a composite score goes on a dashboard.
Where this appears
What's in this reference table
| How the score is used | Reliability needed |
|---|---|
| Early-stage instrument development | 0.70 or higher will do |
| Basic research comparing group means | 0.80 |
| Important decisions about specific scores | 0.90 at minimum |
| Important decisions, desirable standard | 0.95 |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/nunnally-reliability-thresholds-by-use"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/nunnally-reliability-thresholds-by-use/nunnally-reliability-thresholds-by-use.png" alt="Table of Nunnally's reliability thresholds: 0.70 for early-stage work, 0.80 for basic research, 0.90 minimum and 0.95 desirable when decisions rest on scores." width="1200" height="630" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/nunnally-reliability-thresholds-by-use">Nunnally's reliability thresholds, by how the score is used</a>, Koji</p>

