All frameworks and cheat sheets

Reference table

QER in Wales: course evaluation evidence map

ESG standards and Medr expectations matched to the evidence a review team looks for

Table mapping Quality Enhancement Review expectations in Wales to evidence reviewers look for and the course evaluation output that supplies it.
Use it to check your evaluation evidence covers every QER expectation before you write the self-analysis Source: ESG 2015, QAA Quality Enhancement Review handbook, Medr Learner Engagement Code

A mapping table for Welsh higher education quality teams preparing for Quality Enhancement Review. Each row takes one expectation, from ESG 1.3, 1.7 and 1.9 to Medr's Learner Engagement Code and Learner Voice pillar, and lists the evidence a review team looks for and a course evaluation output that supplies it. Use it as a gap check before drafting the self-analysis. Koji produces the evaluation outputs in the third column through AI-moderated student conversations.

What's in this reference table

QER expectationEvidence reviewers look forKoji output
ESG 1.7: collect and use informationEvaluation data per module and programme, used in decisionsReport per evaluation with themes, counts and verbatim quotes
ESG 1.9: monitor programmesModule and programme feedback feeding annual monitoringThe same brief rerun each term, so results stay comparable
ESG 1.9: tell students what changedRecords of actions and how students were toldRecommendations per report, used to draft a response to students
ESG 1.3: student-centred learningEvidence that students' views shape teachingFollow-up questions that ask why a student rated something as they did
Learner Engagement CodeA published commitment to learner engagement and its evaluationEvidence of who took part and what they raised, by cohort
Learner Voice pillar of the Quality FrameworkLocal feedback that complements the NSSConversations that explain the reasons behind NSS-style scores
Consistent, proportionate collectionThe same method across schools and modes of studyOne standard evaluation brief, run the same way for every module
Small and part-time cohortsFeedback even where numbers are smallNo minimum response count; quality scoring screens out throwaway replies
Self-analysis for the reviewThemes and examples drawn from student feedbackExecutive summary and quotes ready to cite in the self-analysis

Use this image

Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:

html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/wales-qer-course-evaluation-evidence-mapping"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/wales-qer-course-evaluation-evidence-mapping/wales-qer-course-evaluation-evidence-mapping.png" alt="Table mapping Quality Enhancement Review expectations in Wales to evidence reviewers look for and the course evaluation output that supplies it." width="1200" height="1139" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/wales-qer-course-evaluation-evidence-mapping">QER in Wales: course evaluation evidence map</a>, Koji</p>