All frameworks and cheat sheets

Reference table

Course evaluation software: LMS and SIS integration compared

How seven course evaluation tools reach students, get their rosters and handle sign-on

Table comparing how seven course evaluation tools reach students in the LMS, where their roster comes from and how users sign in.
Use it to see which tools launch inside your LMS and which take their roster from the SIS
Download PNG

A side-by-side table of how Koji, EvaSys, Explorance Blue, Watermark, Anthology, FeedbackFruits and Qualtrics connect to a university's systems: launch inside the LMS, where the student roster comes from, and how users sign in. It is meant for learning technology, registry and quality teams scoping a course evaluation tender. Compiled from each vendor's public documentation, so confirm current connectors with the vendor before you sign.

What's in this reference table

PlatformLMS launchRoster sourceSign-on
KojiNo LTI tool. Embed on a web page or share a linkCSV import with a personal invite link per student, or the APISAML SSO
EvaSysLTI with Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace and CanvasCentral data source fed by CSV or API importSAML or LDAP
Explorance BlueBlue Connector for Canvas, Blackboard and MoodleInstitutional SIS and HR data sourcesSAML
WatermarkLTI with Canvas and D2L BrightspaceDirect Ellucian Banner and Colleague syncSAML
AnthologyNative in Blackboard, plus LTIEllucian Banner integrationSAML
FeedbackFruitsLTI-native in Canvas, Moodle, Brightspace and BlackboardRoster from the LMS over LTISAML or through the LMS
QualtricsLTI possible, general purposeNo course-section sync. API or SFTP automationsSAML

Use this image

Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:

html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-software-lms-sis-integration-table"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-software-lms-sis-integration-table/course-evaluation-software-lms-sis-integration-table.png" alt="Table comparing how seven course evaluation tools reach students in the LMS, where their roster comes from and how users sign in." width="1200" height="1056" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/course-evaluation-software-lms-sis-integration-table">Course evaluation software: LMS and SIS integration compared</a>, Koji</p>

Related

Table comparing multi-touch attribution, marketing mix modeling and incrementality testing on data needs, offline media, identity loss, speed and causality.

Multi-touch attribution vs marketing mix modeling vs incrementality

Table mapping NVAO small-scale and intensive education criteria to the student evaluation evidence that supports each one.

NVAO small-scale intensive education: evidence map

Two by two table of results from a difference test and an equivalence test: too small to matter, a meaningful difference, equivalent, or inconclusive.

Equivalence test vs difference test: the four outcomes

Table of the five GRADE downgrade domains (risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, publication bias) applied to product research.

GRADE's five reasons to rate evidence down, for product research

Table comparing ethnographic research, user interviews and usability testing on setting, duration, data type, core question, ideal stage and depth.

Ethnography vs user interviews vs usability testing

Table mapping BKO portfolio requirements to what the assessment committee looks for and the evaluation evidence and Koji output that supports each one.

BKO portfolio: student evaluation evidence map