All frameworks and cheat sheets

Reference table

Disclosure vs elaboration in research interviews

Table contrasting disclosure and elaboration: automated modes do better on disclosure, skilled human interviewers on elaboration.
Candor was never the hard part. Follow-up quality is.

Two separate things an interviewer has to get right. Disclosure is whether people say the difficult thing at all, and decades of mode-effect research show automated modes do better because no human is judging. Elaboration is whether people explain why, which depends on real-time follow-up and has historically favored skilled human interviewers. Use it to separate the two questions when judging AI-moderated research tools such as Koji.

Where this appears

What's in this reference table

DisclosureElaboration
The question it answersWill they say the difficult thing at all?Will they explain why, four layers down?
Historically betterAutomated modesSkilled human interviewers
What it depends onPerceived audienceReal-time comprehension and follow-up
Settled by research?Yes, decades agoNo, this is the live question

Use this image

Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:

html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/disclosure-vs-elaboration-ai-interviews"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/disclosure-vs-elaboration-ai-interviews/disclosure-vs-elaboration-ai-interviews.png" alt="Table contrasting disclosure and elaboration: automated modes do better on disclosure, skilled human interviewers on elaboration." width="1200" height="669" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/disclosure-vs-elaboration-ai-interviews">Disclosure vs elaboration in research interviews</a>, Koji</p>