Comparison
European Digital Credentials: what they verify
A side-by-side view of the checks a European Digital Credential for Learning passes in the Europass viewer and the questions about learning quality those checks leave open. It is meant for quality leads, registrars and programme directors deciding what evidence should sit behind a sealed degree or micro-credential. Koji can collect the student and graduate side of that evidence through AI-moderated interviews.
What's in this comparison
What the credential verifies
- Who issued it, under an eIDAS electronic seal
- That nobody changed it after issue
- That it belongs to the person showing it
- That it has not been revoked or expired
- That the issuer has an external QA report on record
What quality evidence still shows
- What the review found for this programme or course
- How students experienced the teaching
- Whether the course prepared them for work
- Whether problems students raised were fixed
- How short courses and online cohorts compare
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/european-digital-credentials-verify-vs-quality-evidence"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/european-digital-credentials-verify-vs-quality-evidence/european-digital-credentials-verify-vs-quality-evidence.png" alt="Comparison of what a European Digital Credential verifies, from issuer and integrity to accreditation record, against what quality evidence still has to show." width="1200" height="709" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/european-digital-credentials-verify-vs-quality-evidence">European Digital Credentials: what they verify</a>, Koji</p>
