Reference table
Flipped classrooms: learning vs satisfaction
A side by side view of four meta-analyses of flipped classrooms and what each found for learning outcomes and for student satisfaction. It is meant for quality assurance staff and programme boards who review a flipped module on its course evaluation. The pattern is that learning gains are modest and satisfaction gains smaller or absent, so ratings alone tend to undersell a flip. Koji can add questions about pre-class work and contact time to the evaluation.
What's in this reference table
| Meta-analysis | Scope | Learning | Satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| van Alten et al. 2019 | 114 studies, mostly higher education | Small positive effect | No effect overall |
| Låg and Sæle 2019 | 272 learning effect sizes | g = 0.35, or 0.24 in well powered studies | g = 0.16, likely inflated by publication bias |
| Cheng et al. 2019 | Learning outcomes only | g = 0.19 | Not analysed |
| Bredow et al. 2021 | 317 studies, higher education | Ahead on 7 of 8 outcomes, g = 0.20 to 0.53 | One of those 8 outcomes |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/flipped-classroom-meta-analyses-learning-vs-satisfaction"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/flipped-classroom-meta-analyses-learning-vs-satisfaction/flipped-classroom-meta-analyses-learning-vs-satisfaction.png" alt="Table comparing four meta-analyses of flipped classrooms: effects on learning outcomes are small to moderate, effects on satisfaction are smaller or absent." width="1200" height="641" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/flipped-classroom-meta-analyses-learning-vs-satisfaction">Flipped classrooms: learning vs satisfaction</a>, Koji</p>
