Reference table
Koji vs Typeform for course evaluation
A side-by-side table of Typeform and Koji for university course evaluation. It compares how each collects student feedback, how open text gets analysed, what each does for closing the loop and where student data is stored. Quality and teaching leads can use it to brief a procurement or evaluation committee. Koji runs the interview side, with themes and quotes linked back to transcripts.
What's in this reference table
| Typeform | Koji | |
|---|---|---|
| Core model | Form, one question per screen | AI-moderated interview, text or voice |
| Follow-up questions | None, fixed logic jumps | Follows up based on each answer |
| Open-text analysis | Manual export or a separate tool | Automatic themes, quotes linked to transcripts |
| Same rules for every student | Same wording, depth varies | Same moderation rules for everyone |
| Mid-term rerun | Possible, analysis is manual | Duplicate the study each term |
| Closing the loop | Not built in | No action log, recommendations tied to themes |
| Evidence for review | Raw responses to assemble | Themed report as slides or PDF |
| EU data storage | Custom tiers only, US by default | Standard |
| Best fit | Branded surveys and intake forms | The reasons behind course ratings |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-typeform-course-evaluation-table"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-typeform-course-evaluation-table/koji-vs-typeform-course-evaluation-table.png" alt="Comparison table of Koji and Typeform for course evaluation across follow-up probing, analysis, closing the loop and EU data storage." width="1200" height="911" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-typeform-course-evaluation-table">Koji vs Typeform for course evaluation</a>, Koji</p>
