Reference table
Koji vs Webropol for course evaluation
A side-by-side table of Webropol and Koji for university course and teaching evaluation. It compares how each collects feedback, how open text is analysed, how closing the loop and cross-term reporting work, and where data is stored. Nordic quality and teaching leads can use it when deciding whether interviews add enough to sit next to an existing Webropol licence.
What's in this reference table
| Webropol | Koji | |
|---|---|---|
| Core model | Survey and reporting platform | AI-moderated interview, text or voice |
| Data collection | Same questions for every student | Follows up based on each answer |
| Open-text analysis | AI Text Analysis: themes, sentiment, summaries | Automatic themes, quotes linked to transcripts |
| Closing the loop | Manual, outside the tool | Manual, with recommendations tied to themes |
| Cross-term trends | Built-in reporting | Rerun a duplicated study and compare reports |
| Events and other surveys | Events module | Built for interviews |
| Data storage | EU/EEA, per Finnish privacy notices | EU, under the standard DPA |
| Nordic footprint | Campus licences at many universities | Newer entrant |
| Best fit | Broad institutional surveying | The reasons behind course ratings |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-webropol-course-evaluation-table"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-webropol-course-evaluation-table/koji-vs-webropol-course-evaluation-table.png" alt="Comparison table of Koji and Webropol for course evaluation across data collection, open-text analysis, closing the loop and data residency." width="1200" height="961" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-webropol-course-evaluation-table">Koji vs Webropol for course evaluation</a>, Koji</p>
