Checklist
Lecture recording policy evaluation checklist
What to measure before deciding how to record lectures
A nine-point checklist for evaluating lecture capture or lecture recording policy in a university module. It is for programme teams and quality committees deciding whether to record everything, nudge attendance or release recordings with a delay. It separates attendance from viewing, asks students why they watch, and treats subgroups and marks data with care. Koji interviews can collect the reasons that logs and attendance records cannot show.
What's in this checklist
- Record attendance and recording views as separate measures
- Use viewing logs instead of asking students to recall how much they watched
- Ask whether students watch after attending, instead of attending, or both
- Ask why: illness, work, caring, travel, language, revision or choice
- Run a short check-in mid-term, not only at the end
- Look at first-year, working and second-language students separately
- Report subgroups only where numbers protect anonymity
- Link viewing and attendance to marks only with a clear lawful basis
- Compare cohorts and note other changes made at the same time
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/lecture-recording-policy-evaluation-checklist"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/lecture-recording-policy-evaluation-checklist/lecture-recording-policy-evaluation-checklist.png" alt="Checklist for evaluating a lecture recording policy, from measuring attendance and viewing separately to asking students why they watch and comparing cohorts." width="1200" height="706" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/lecture-recording-policy-evaluation-checklist">Lecture recording policy evaluation checklist</a>, Koji</p>
