Framework
What shapes medical students' overall course ratings
A framework of the four groups of factors that a systematic review of 25 studies found behind students' overall ratings of undergraduate medical courses. It is for medical school evaluation leads and curriculum committees who read overall ratings and want to know what else is in them. Use it to check that your evaluation asks about the exam and prior interest separately. Koji can add a follow-up to each rating so the reasons are recorded too.
What's in this framework
- Student characteristics: Who the student is. Female students and students more interested in the subject rated courses higher.
- Exposure to teaching: What students experienced: the formats, the teachers and the contact time.
- Satisfaction with exams: Higher exam scores and more satisfaction with the exams went with higher ratings.
- The evaluation process: How, when and in what form the evaluation was run.
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/medical-course-ratings-four-factor-groups"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/medical-course-ratings-four-factor-groups/medical-course-ratings-four-factor-groups.png" alt="Framework of four factor groups behind medical students' course ratings: student traits, exposure to teaching, exam satisfaction and the evaluation process." width="1200" height="752" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/medical-course-ratings-four-factor-groups">What shapes medical students' overall course ratings</a>, Koji</p>
