Reference table
Quantitative rigor terms and their qualitative equivalents
How validity, reliability and objectivity map to Lincoln and Guba's criteria

Qualitative research does not use the validity and reliability vocabulary of quantitative work. This table pairs each quantitative concept with the term Lincoln and Guba proposed in 1985. It helps researchers explain their rigor in terms a mixed audience recognizes.
Where this appears
What's in this reference table
| Quantitative concept | Qualitative equivalent |
|---|---|
| Internal validity | Credibility |
| External validity | Transferability |
| Reliability | Dependability |
| Objectivity | Confirmability |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/validity-reliability-qualitative-equivalents-table"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/validity-reliability-qualitative-equivalents-table/validity-reliability-qualitative-equivalents-table.png" alt="Table pairing quantitative rigor terms with qualitative ones, such as internal validity with credibility and reliability with dependability." width="1200" height="630" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/validity-reliability-qualitative-equivalents-table">Quantitative rigor terms and their qualitative equivalents</a>, Koji</p>

