Comparison
Destination metrics vs progression evidence
A side-by-side comparison for programme leads and quality teams evaluating programmes for mature and part-time students. Destination metrics record where a graduate is about 15 months on; progression evidence records what changed from a baseline at entry. Use it to argue for, and design, programme-level evidence that shows the distance graduates travelled. Koji can collect the baseline and follow-up through conversational interviews with structured questions.
What's in this comparison
Destination metrics
- Record what a graduate is doing about 15 months on
- Count a job held before enrolling like a new outcome
- Code roles by occupation, missing promotions within it
- Use annual earnings that ignore hours worked
Progression evidence
- Record role and goals at entry as a baseline
- Ask what changed since enrolling, and why
- Collect concrete examples of learning used at work
- Follow up again after three to five years
- Report outcomes by employment status at entry
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/destination-metrics-vs-progression-evidence-part-time-graduates"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/destination-metrics-vs-progression-evidence-part-time-graduates/destination-metrics-vs-progression-evidence-part-time-graduates.png" alt="Comparison of destination metrics with progression evidence for mature and part-time graduates, showing what each records and what it misses." width="1200" height="669" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/destination-metrics-vs-progression-evidence-part-time-graduates">Destination metrics vs progression evidence</a>, Koji</p>
