Comparison
EvaSys vs Koji: which one fits your course evaluation
A side-by-side guide for quality assurance leads choosing between EvaSys, a survey platform for online, paper and hybrid course evaluation, and Koji, which runs AI-moderated interviews with students and themes the answers automatically. Use it to match each tool to the problem you actually have. Many institutions keep EvaSys for mandated numeric instruments and add Koji where they need the reasons behind the ratings.
What's in this comparison
When EvaSys fits better
- Many evaluations still run on paper and need central scanning
- One fixed numeric questionnaire for benchmarking every term
- Accreditation evidence already built on numeric SET data
- Procurement treats ISO 27001 certification as a hard gate
When Koji fits better
- Comment boxes come back thin and nobody can ask why
- Free-text piles up because hand-coding takes too long
- You want feedback mid-module, while there is still time to act
- Reviewers ask for qualitative evidence, not only trend lines
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/evasys-vs-koji-course-evaluation-fit"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/evasys-vs-koji-course-evaluation-fit/evasys-vs-koji-course-evaluation-fit.png" alt="Comparison of when EvaSys suits course evaluation better, such as paper forms, and when Koji's AI interviews suit it better." width="1200" height="722" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/evasys-vs-koji-course-evaluation-fit">EvaSys vs Koji: which one fits your course evaluation</a>, Koji</p>
