All frameworks and cheat sheets

Comparison

Normalized gain: traditional vs interactive engagement

Hake's 1998 survey of 62 introductory physics courses on the same concept tests

Comparison of average normalized gain in Hake's 1998 survey: 14 traditional courses at 0.23 against 48 interactive-engagement courses at 0.48.
Same test, very different learning gains depending on how the course was taught. Source: Hake (1998), American Journal of Physics

Results from Richard Hake's 1998 survey of 62 introductory physics courses and 6,542 students who took the same concept tests before and after the course. Traditional lecture courses averaged a normalized gain of 0.23; interactive-engagement courses averaged 0.48. Useful for quality teams who want direct learning evidence next to student ratings. Koji can collect student feedback that helps explain why a course's ratings and learning gains disagree.

What's in this comparison

Traditional lecture courses

  • 14 courses, 2,084 students
  • Little or no interactive engagement
  • Average normalized gain: 0.23

Interactive-engagement courses

  • 48 courses, 4,458 students
  • Hands-on, minds-on activities with quick feedback
  • Average normalized gain: 0.48

Use this image

Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:

html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/hake-normalized-gain-traditional-vs-interactive-engagement"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/hake-normalized-gain-traditional-vs-interactive-engagement/hake-normalized-gain-traditional-vs-interactive-engagement.png" alt="Comparison of average normalized gain in Hake's 1998 survey: 14 traditional courses at 0.23 against 48 interactive-engagement courses at 0.48." width="1200" height="630" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/hake-normalized-gain-traditional-vs-interactive-engagement">Normalized gain: traditional vs interactive engagement</a>, Koji</p>