Reference table
Koji vs GetWhy: AI interview platforms compared
A side-by-side table of GetWhy and Koji, two platforms that use AI to run qualitative interviews. It covers interview format, who runs the study, where participants come from, languages, turnaround, how you buy and who each one suits. GetWhy figures are the company's own claims. Use it to shortlist an AI interview tool; Koji lets you test the self-serve route with a free account.
Where this appears
What's in this reference table
| GetWhy | Koji | |
|---|---|---|
| Interview format | AI-moderated video interviews | AI voice and text interviews, plus phone calls |
| Who runs the study | GetWhy's platform, with its researchers reviewing each study | You, with an AI assistant that drafts the brief |
| Participants | Multi-vendor panel GetWhy says reaches 300M people | Your own customers by link or CSV, or Koji's research panel |
| Languages | 100+ languages and markets, per GetWhy | 28 interview languages |
| Turnaround | 48 hours from brief to insight, per GetWhy | Results update as each interview finishes |
| Buying model | Contact sales, priced per study | Self-serve, starts free, public pricing |
| Best fit | Enterprise consumer and CPG brands | Product, research and marketing teams of any size |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-getwhy-comparison-table"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-getwhy-comparison-table/koji-vs-getwhy-comparison-table.png" alt="Table comparing GetWhy and Koji on interview format, who runs the study, participants, languages, turnaround, buying model and best fit" width="1200" height="931" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-getwhy-comparison-table">Koji vs GetWhy: AI interview platforms compared</a>, Koji</p>
