Reference table
Koji vs Netigate for course evaluation
A side-by-side table of Koji and Netigate for university course evaluation, based on public vendor information as of October 2026. It covers what each tool is, how it collects feedback, how open text is analysed, follow-up questions, education workflow and data residency. Quality directors and procurement teams can use it to brief a selection panel. Koji runs course evaluations as AI-moderated interviews and groups answers into themes with recommended actions.
What's in this reference table
| Koji | Netigate | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dedicated AI course-evaluation platform | General experience-management survey platform |
| Origin | EU-based, AI-native | Sweden, hosted on EU-based servers |
| Core method | AI-moderated conversational interviews | Static surveys with branching, skip logic and anonymous mode |
| Open-text analysis | Automatic thematic analysis of transcripts | AI text analysis of open answers and scores |
| Follow-up probing | Adaptive, same standard for every student | None, the questionnaire is fixed |
| Education workflow | Course cycle, formative and summative, recommended actions | None built in, configured per use case |
| Data residency | EU and GDPR-first | ISO 27001, GDPR-compliant, EU-based servers |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-netigate-course-evaluation-comparison"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-netigate-course-evaluation-comparison/koji-vs-netigate-course-evaluation-comparison.png" alt="Table comparing Koji and Netigate for course evaluation on category, method, open-text analysis, follow-up probing, education workflow and data residency." width="1200" height="903" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/koji-vs-netigate-course-evaluation-comparison">Koji vs Netigate for course evaluation</a>, Koji</p>
