Comparison
A weak AI interviewer vs a good one
A side-by-side list of the habits that mark a weak AI interviewer and a good one. Use it as a quick test when you pilot an AI moderator: run a few practice interviews and note which column each behaviour falls in. Koji was built around the right-hand column, from adaptive follow-ups to structured answers for every question type.
Where this appears
What's in this comparison
A weak AI interviewer
- Reads questions word for word, whatever was said
- Treats every answer the same way
- Asks voice participants to click a button
- Has no research method, just generic chat
- Gives you free text and nothing structured
A good AI interviewer
- Follows up on what the participant actually said
- Knows when to stop probing
- Mixes structured and open questions in one flow
- Avoids leading questions
- Respects language, time limits and refusals
- Gives you output your other tools can read
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/good-vs-weak-ai-interviewer-comparison"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/good-vs-weak-ai-interviewer-comparison/good-vs-weak-ai-interviewer-comparison.png" alt="Comparison of a weak and a good AI interviewer: scripted questions and free text only, against real follow-ups and structured output." width="1200" height="697" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/good-vs-weak-ai-interviewer-comparison">A weak AI interviewer vs a good one</a>, Koji</p>
