All frameworks and cheat sheets

Reference table

Planning evidence: Koji vs the alternatives

What each approach can tell you before planning day

Table comparing Koji, analytics and tickets, scheduled calls and surveys on why, reach, consistency, speed, counts with quotes and analysis effort.
What each approach can and cannot tell you before planning day.

A comparison of four ways to gather customer evidence before quarterly planning: Koji's AI-moderated interviews, analytics and support tickets, scheduled calls, and surveys. It is for product managers deciding how to back roadmap bets in a three-week window, and it is a Koji view of the trade-offs.

Where this appears

What's in this reference table

KojiAnalytics and ticketsScheduled callsSurveys
Tells you whyYes, with follow-upsNo, only whatYesOnly in free text
Reaches people who never askedYes, by linkOnly users who actHard to bookYes
Same questions for everyoneYesNot applicableVaries by moderatorYes
Time to a reportDaysAlready thereWeeks to scheduleDays
Counts and quotes togetherYesCounts onlyQuotes onlyCounts, thin quotes
Effort to analyseReport built for youDashboardsHours per callModerate

Use this image

Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:

html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/planning-evidence-sprint-koji-vs-alternatives"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/planning-evidence-sprint-koji-vs-alternatives/planning-evidence-sprint-koji-vs-alternatives.png" alt="Table comparing Koji, analytics and tickets, scheduled calls and surveys on why, reach, consistency, speed, counts with quotes and analysis effort." width="1200" height="769" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/planning-evidence-sprint-koji-vs-alternatives">Planning evidence: Koji vs the alternatives</a>, Koji</p>