Reference table
Respondent alternatives compared
Seven recruiting and research platforms, side by side
A side-by-side table of seven alternatives to Respondent: Koji, User Interviews, Prolific, Dscout, UserTesting, UXtweak and Askable or CleverX. It shows each platform's main strength, whether it runs the interview itself and whether analysis is built in. Use it to decide if recruiting is your only bottleneck or the whole research workflow is.
Where this appears
What's in this reference table
| Platform | Primary strength | Runs the interview? | Built-in analysis? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Koji | AI-moderated interviews and analysis, recruitment built in | Yes | Yes |
| User Interviews | Large panel | No | No |
| Prolific | Vetted global sample | No | No |
| Dscout | Mobile in-context research | Partly | Partly |
| UserTesting | Usability panel | Partly | Partly |
| UXtweak | Multi-method suite | Partly | Partly |
| Askable / CleverX | Regional and B2B panels | No | No |
Use this image
Free to use in your docs, decks and posts under CC BY 4.0, as long as you credit Koji with a link to this page. To embed it, paste this into your page:
html
<a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/respondent-alternatives-compared-table"><img src="https://www.koji.so/visuals/respondent-alternatives-compared-table/respondent-alternatives-compared-table.png" alt="Table comparing seven Respondent alternatives by main strength, whether the tool runs the interview and whether it includes analysis." width="1200" height="803" /></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.koji.so/visuals/respondent-alternatives-compared-table">Respondent alternatives compared</a>, Koji</p>
