How the Quality Gate Works
Understand Koji's quality gate — conversations scoring below 3/5 are completely free and don't consume credits, protecting your research budget.
The Quality Gate: Never Pay for Bad Data
Koji's quality gate is a built-in protection that ensures you only spend credits on meaningful conversations. Any interview that scores below 3 on Koji's 1-5 quality scale is completely free — no credits consumed, no charges incurred.
This applies to every plan, including overage conversations.
How Quality Scoring Works
Every conversation on Koji is automatically scored on a 1–5 scale based on the depth and quality of the interaction:
| Score | Quality Level | Credits Charged? |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Below threshold | No — free |
| 3 | Meets threshold | Yes — credits charged |
| 4–5 | High quality | Yes — credits charged |
The scoring evaluates factors like:
- Response depth — Did the participant give substantive, detailed answers?
- Conversation completeness — Did the interview cover the key topics?
- Engagement level — Was the participant actively engaged throughout?
- Information value — Did the conversation generate actionable insights?
Why the Quality Gate Matters
Budget Protection
Without a quality gate, every conversation would cost credits — even ones where:
- A participant abandoned the interview early
- Responses were too brief to be useful
- The participant didn't engage meaningfully with the questions
With Koji's quality gate, these low-value interactions are filtered out automatically. You only pay for conversations that actually contribute to your research.
Real Impact on Your Budget
Consider a typical research study with 50 total conversations:
- ~40 conversations score 3+ (quality threshold met) — credits charged
- ~10 conversations score below 3 — completely free
That's a 20% savings on your credit budget, automatically applied.
Quality Gate Across All Plans
| Plan | Quality Gate | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Active | Low-quality conversations don't consume your 10 starter credits |
| Insights | Active | Low-quality conversations don't consume your 29 monthly credits |
| Interviews | Active | Low-quality conversations don't consume your 79 monthly credits |
| Enterprise | Active | Low-quality conversations don't consume your allocated credits |
Quality Gate During Overage
The quality gate also applies during overage billing. If you've exceeded your included credits and a conversation scores below 3 on the 1-5 scale, no overage charge is generated. You are never billed for low-quality interactions, period.
Quality Gate in Reports
The quality gate doesn't just protect your budget — it also protects your research quality. Reports only include conversations that score 3 or above. Low-scoring conversations are excluded from report aggregation, theme analysis, and statistical summaries. This ensures your research findings are built on substantive, high-quality data rather than being diluted by low-effort responses.
You can still view individual low-scoring transcripts in the Responses tab for reference, but they won't affect your aggregated insights.
What Affects Conversation Quality
Several factors influence whether a conversation meets the quality threshold:
Participant-Side Factors
- Engagement — participants who take the interview seriously produce higher scores
- Response length — one-word answers typically result in lower scores
- Relevance — responses that address the actual questions score higher
- Completion — finishing the full interview improves the score
Study Design Factors (You Control These)
- Clear, open-ended questions — well-crafted questions encourage detailed responses
- Appropriate interview length — not too short (insufficient depth) or too long (fatigue)
- Good probe points — AI follow-up prompts that encourage elaboration
- Relevant guardrails — keeping conversations on topic improves quality
- Structured questions — mixing in scale, choice, and ranking questions helps maintain engagement and produces richer data
Tips to Maximize Quality Scores
- Write open-ended questions — "Tell me about..." instead of "Do you like...?"
- Set up probe points — guide the AI to dig deeper on key topics
- Keep interviews focused — 5-8 core questions is the sweet spot
- Use guardrails — prevent conversations from going off-topic
- Target the right participants — better targeting = better engagement
- Use voice interviews — voice conversations tend to produce richer, more detailed responses
- Add structured questions — scale and choice questions keep participants engaged between open-ended exploration
Viewing Quality Scores
You can see quality scores for each conversation in your study dashboard:
- Navigate to your study
- Open the Responses tab
- Each conversation shows its quality score (1-5)
- Filter by score to review which conversations met the threshold
- Low-scoring conversations are marked and clearly shown as free
The Quality Gate and Research Integrity
The quality gate improves your research quality in two ways:
- Budget protection — you only spend credits on conversations that met the quality threshold
- Report accuracy — reports aggregate only conversations scoring 3 or above, ensuring your insights are built from substantive data
- Targeting feedback — consistently low scores may indicate you need to adjust your participant criteria
- Study design insights — patterns in low-scoring conversations reveal opportunities to refine your questions
Related Articles
AI Interviewer Tuning: How to Get Research-Grade Voice Interviews
A complete playbook for tuning Koji's AI interviewer — company context, probing depth, structured questions, and interview mode — to deliver interviews indistinguishable from a human researcher.
Understanding Quality Scores
Learn how Koji evaluates interview quality on a 0-5 scale and why it matters for your research and billing.
Understanding Usage & Credits
Learn how Koji's credit system works — what actions cost credits, how limits are tracked, and how to manage your research budget effectively.
Overage Billing Explained
Understand how overage billing works on Koji — flat €1/credit pricing, configurable caps, and how the quality gate protects your budget.
Managing Research Participants: The Complete Guide to Koji's Recruit Tab
How to track, filter, import, and export research participants in Koji — including personalized links, quality management, and CRM integration.
Best AI Interview Software in 2026: 9 Platforms Compared
A side-by-side review of the leading AI interview platforms in 2026 — Koji, Listen Labs, Strella, Outset, Marvin, Conveo, Glaut, Feedbk, and User Intuition. Pricing, modality, recruitment, analysis, and the right tool for each use case.
Koji vs Listen Labs: AI Interview Platform Comparison (2026)
An honest, side-by-side comparison of Koji and Listen Labs — pricing, features, recruitment, analysis, and which AI interview platform is the right fit for your team.
Koji vs Marvin (HeyMarvin): End-to-End AI Interviews vs. Analysis-Only Repository
Koji vs Marvin compared head-to-head. Marvin centralizes and analyzes interviews you have already conducted; Koji actually runs the interview AND analyzes it. Pricing, features, and the right pick for your team.
User Interview Software: A 2026 Buyer's Guide
How to choose user interview software in 2026 — vendor categories, evaluation criteria, pricing models, and the right pick for product, UX, marketing, and research teams.
Interview Completion Flow
What happens when an interview ends — thank-you screen, participant feedback, and behind-the-scenes AI analysis.